Archive for the ‘Web Search’ Category

Research from Europe: A New System Preserves the Right to Privacy in Internet Searches

Friday, November 6th, 2009

From an ACM TechNews Summary

Researchers from Rovira i Virgili University, Autonoma of Barcelona, and Oberta of Catalonia have developed a system that protects the privacy of Internet search engine users through a new computer protocol. “It is a model based on cryptographic tools, which distort the profile of users when they use search engines on Internet in such a way that their privacy is preserved,” says Rovira i Virgili University’s Alexandre Viego. The researchers note that there are systems that provide anonymous navigation, but say their system provides a significant improvement in response time over anonymous systems, though it still delays searches slightly. The new protocol has already been tested in both closed research center intranets and on the Internet, and the results have made the researchers optimistic about a global implementation model. The researchers are currently working on the development of a final user version, and believe that it will soon be easy to integrate the system into the major platforms and browsers.

Read the Complete News Item

Source: AlphaGalileo

Ken Aulleta, Author of “‘Googled’: Biography Of A Company, And An Age” Chats with Terry Gross on NPR

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

Noted author Ken Auletta’s new book, ‘Googled’: Biography Of A Company, And An Age, was released earlier this week and on Monday, November 2, 2009 he was interview on NPR (National Public Radio).

Linked Here You’ll Find:

+ A 30 Minute Radio Interview with Ken Auletta on NPR’s Fresh Air with Terry Gross. You can listen online or download the file.

+ A Program Summary.

+ An Excerpt from the Book.

+A Text Transcript of the Radio Interview

Source: NPR
Hat Tip: All Points Blog

Review: What Bing Does Best

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

Access the Complete Review: What Bing Does Best

It’s difficult, if not impossible to run a few or more searches and say a search database (especially a general purpose one is the best) in all situations. Not only does each search engine have its own algorithm but there are numerous variables that can come into play like experience of the searcher, number of search terms used, advanced sytax, etc.

Last night we ran several web searches (we were trying to find an article) and received better results from Bing than we did from Google. However, more searching will undoubtedly take place and it’s very possible that Google will provide better results than Bing. This is why it’s not a bad idea to use more than one search engine making sure each one has a unique database. In other words, while AltaVista and AllTheWeb are still on the web they utilize the same database that Yahoo uses. This is also why learning about and using specialty search tools is worth some of you’re already busy time. Knowing that they exist before running a search on a general engine (to find them) can save you lots of time and add plenty of value. In other words, building your own virtual reference shelf.

When reading the conclusion of an otherwise positive Bing overview, Leslie Meredith, the author of the review, says to use Google for “research” and Bing for, “images, videos, shopping, travel and gossip.” Overall, that’s good stuff for Bing. However, it’s the use Google for “research” that gets to us. How about if you’re looking for images, videos, etc. Isn’t that research too? In your opinion, what’s wrong with Bing, we will call it “research search.”

OK, enough of that. Here’s quick look at what the review has to say about Bing.

+ Positive about the new image found each day on the home page and placing your cursor at different places on the image provides background.

+ Image searching: Positive comments about the continuous scroll and the tools to focus your search.

+ Video Search: Also positive mentions how you can place your cursor on a static video image and immediately a 30 second sample is played (with audio) without having to depart the search results page.

+ Finally positive comments about shopping search (cashback program) and travel search (fare predictor).

Unfortunately, there is no mention of Bing Maps and of it’s useful imagery. The the “Bird’s Eye” view will let someone giving a speech receive and ooh and ahh from the audience. (-: We mentioned it and shared a few examples in this post from yesterday.

Access the Complete Review: What Bing Does Best

Source: Live Science

How to access newsgroups when your ISP dumps Usenet

Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009

How to access newsgroups when your ISP dumps Usenet

Verizon recently joined the likes of Comcast and Time Warner, becoming the latest Internet service provider to stop giving its customers access to newsgroups on Usenet, a decades-old collection of thousands of message boards worldwide.

In announcing its decision, Verizon mentioned a Web site that lists third-party commercial “news servers” that provide Usenet access for around $10 a month. Some offer free or low-cost trials.

What Verizon didn’t tell customers is that they can get free access to Usenet and other types of message boards through Google Groups. A Web-based service like Google isn’t as convenient as using news reader software, such as Windows Outlook Express or Windows Mail. But unlike with software, you can use Google to search the so-called Usenet archive, a database of more than 800 millions posts going back to 1981.

You also may find free news servers by searching the Web. We found a couple of sites that list them, including Newsparrot and the DMOZ open directory project. Some of the information we saw was out of date. But on Monday, we were able to post messages through one free server, news.gmane.org. For information about adding a news account, check your newsreader’s help files.

Source: Consumer Reports Money & Shopping Blog

Google Search Helps Uncover a Rare Photograph at the National Library at the National Library of Australia

Friday, October 30th, 2009

From a Brief Article in eNews (National Library of Australia)

A small, brown photograph recently uncovered at the Library has been confirmed as the world’s only known vintage print of the arrival of Roald Amundsen’s 1911 expedition at the South Pole.

The vintage print was brought to light when a Google search led the Curator of the Pictures Collection at the National Library of Norway, Harald Ostgaard Lund, to the National Library of Australia’s collection.

An iconic image in Norway, it is expected to go on loan to Norway in 2011 for a special exhibition to mark the 100th anniversary of Amundsen’s arrival at the South Pole.

You can view the photograph here.

Source: NLA

Google’s Enhanced Music Service; Real Estate Listings on Google Maps

Thursday, October 29th, 2009

We said yesterday in our post about Google Navigation Mobile, that it seems lately a day doesn’t go by with something new or enhanced from Google. Today is no different. Matt McGee from Search Engine Land tells us about a new layer in Google Maps containing real estate listings and the emusic service that launched last night.

First, real estate listings are now more visible in Google Maps with the new real estate “layer”. To access the listings, click the “More” button at the top of a map (near the satellite imagery or terrain maps buttons) and select real estate. Immediately, the listings become visible on the map. Click any red “pin” and you’ll see the address, get driving directions, etc. Click the “more info” link to see all the information about the property. Here’s a view of properties for the Zip Code 90210. Now you can zoom in and out and move the around the maps like you’ve always done.

Also, note the listings located on the left side of the page. Here, you can find basic info about each property and find a link to click and get all the available info. You can also refine your results here by:

+ Price Range
+ Listing Type
+ Number of Bedrooms
+ Number of Bathrooms
+ Area Range (in Square Feet)

It’s possible to only search to real estate listings by selecting “Real Estate” in the drop down menu located next to the search box at the top of the page.

Next, Matt introduces the new, improved, and enhanced Google Music Search. Google has offered a music “one box” located at the top of a results page for since December, 2005. Here’s an article that Gary wrote about music search at that time.

This is a major enhancement to the music search.

Matt writes:


According to today’s announcement [this story and news release are from late Wednesday afternoon], searches for the name of an artist, album, or song will show the new OneBox in Google’s main search results.* If you search for an artist or album name, the OneBox will include a set of four songs that are chosen algorithmically by the partner music site*, not by Google. Each song will be linked to an audio clip that will play in a Flash-based pop-up window provided by the partner site. In some cases, the partner may provide one full play of the song before defaulting to a 30-second preview.

Matt points out that the rumors about Google selling music are not true (at least for now).

Google’s RJ Pittman told us today that, while some of their music partners have a commerce element, the focus of Google’s new music search is information, not selling digital songs. In fact, there’s no commercial arrangement at all, we’re told, between Google and the music partner sites included in this launch.

Finally, the article correctly notes that Yahoo Music has been available for years and they
continue to offer music info and the ability to preview music/watch videos, link to the official site, get lyrics, photos, videos, etc. from a box at the top of web pages when a group or solo artist triggers the database.

He also points out (this is cool) that in some cases, if you enter song lyrics into the search box, youll get back the song info as a “one box” result. Here’s an example.

Speaking of song lyrics, a few weeks ago we posted about a searchable song lyric service, LyricWiki, being acquired by Wikia, an online community of wikis and content hubs that was started by Wikipedia co-founder, Jimmy Wales.

* Partners include: MySpace, Pandora, Lala, imeem, and Rhapsody.

Source: Search Engine Land

Google Social Search Goes Live at Google Labs Experimental

Monday, October 26th, 2009

From a Search Engine Land Post by Danny Sullivan:

Google Social Search is rolling out, a new service from Google that allows you to easily find material written by people you know and trust. It’s a pretty cool idea, especially in that it’s pretty painless to get started using it. The service will be available through Google Labs Experimental.

Danny goes on (it’s important reading) to explain what Google Social Search is and is not.

He makes it very clear the Google Social is NOT real time search and NOT Twitter search although Google made an announcement last week that they had made a deal with Twitter.

What is it?

It’s a way that Google figures out people you trust, then ensures that you see content from them showing up in your search results.

[Snip]

How does Google know what your social circle is, in order to produce the social search results? Three methods, the company told me, when I talked with Google about the service:

* Your Google Reader account
* Your Google Chat / Gmail Contacts
* Your Google Profile

You can access Google Social here.

Much Much More from Danny about Google Social

Source: SEL

See Also: Official Google Blog Post

All the information that appears as part of Google Social Search is published publicly on the web — you can find it without Social Search if you really want to. What we’ve done is surface that content together in one single place to make your results more relevant. The way we do it is by building a social circle of your friends and contacts using the connections linked from your public Google profile, such as the people you’re following on Twitter or FriendFeed. The results are specific to you, so you need to be signed in to your Google Account to use Social Search. If you use Gmail, we’ll also include your chat buddies and contacts in your friends, family, and coworkers groups. And if you use Google Reader, we’ll include some websites from your subscriptions as part of your social search results.

Are You Ready to Go to Googland?

Monday, October 26th, 2009

A day doesn’t go by that Google is announcing, updating, or just doing something they want to tell the world about. While sites like Search Engine Land, Search Engine Roundtable, and Search Engine Journal do a great job of not only presenting the news but also offering some perspective, they always don’t get to everything from the folks in Mountain View, CA.

Of course, the ResourceShelf team also tries our best to make sure you know about what Google is up to. But, like the others, we don’t get to everything.

That’s why Googland is so useful. Google usually makes their “official announcement” on one of many blogs. Googland aggregates content from many (not all) Google blogs into a single location (with an RSS feed, of course). After a few days of visiting the Googland you’ll be simply amazed at the number of posts that come from the ‘Plex.”

Access Googland

First Bing and Now Google Makes Deal to Provide Twitter Results

Wednesday, October 21st, 2009

Just hours after Bing made an announcement that they’ll now offer Twitter results at: http://www.bing.com/twitter, Google has just announced that will also offer Twitter results.

From a Google Blog Post by Marissa Mayer:

At Google, our goal is to create the most comprehensive, relevant and fast search in the world. In the past few years, an entirely new type of data has emerged — real-time updates like those on Twitter have appeared not only as a way for people to communicate their thoughts and feelings, but also as an interesting source of data about what is happening right now in regard to a particular topic.

Given this new type of information and its value to search, we are very excited to announce that we have reached an agreement with Twitter to include their updates in our search results. We believe that our search results and user experience will greatly benefit from the inclusion of this up-to-the-minute data, and [our emphasis] we look forward to having a product that showcases how tweets can make search better in the coming months.

Btw, at the same time Bing announced their Twitter results engine, they also said that they have made a deal with Facebook to also include their results. That stream of content will be available at a later date.

Matt McGee is blogging Marissa Mayer’s panel at Web 2.0 (with several other big names). You can find the live-blogging here.

Bing Announces Does Deal to Amass and Search Twitter Data; Facebook Data Too!

Wednesday, October 21st, 2009

UPDATE (6:30pm EDST): Google Will Also Offer Twitter Results, More Here.

UPDATE 1 from Gary) The new interface is now online at:

http://www.bing.com/twitter

+ Note the tag-cloud and the list of “hot topics” on the home page. Clink an item and you’ll see:

++ Most Recent Tweets about X

++Top Links Shared in Posts about X

+ Search results automatically refresh unless you hit the pause button (note other services do the same type of thing)

+ Clicking the RT button will take you to your Twitter page ready (with the info already in the box) to retweet. If you don’t have an account it will take you to a page to register (if you want to).

+ Some searches will trigger other results from the Bing engine. For example, note this result for #Chicago and how it shows links to other Bing content on the right side of the page.

+ When you see a shortened url from bit.ly for example, look to the right shortened and in parenthesis, you’ll see the domain of the url that’s being shortened. (Thanks Danny!)

UPDATE 2) In addition to the Search Engine Land post below, Danny Sullivan, will be updating with new data as it becomes available here.
It’s loaded with information and screenshots.

UPDATE 3) More in a Bing Blog Post

UPDATE 4) Matt McGee from Search Engine Land live-blogged Microsoft’s Qi Lu’s (Head of Microsoft Search) interview/presentation at the Web 2.0 Conference.

Here is Some of What We Learned:

+ Bing is using “Best Match” technology to dedupe results and then focus in on those results
+ Spam filtering is being used
+ What else effects Twitter results at Bing?
+

Quality – look at who’s tweeting and assign soicla relevance score popularity – look at the caption – length of comment, links, etc., affect quality and relevance usefulness – number of retweets affects results.

As noted above and elsewhere you might not see every “tweet” when using Bing.

Source: Search Engine Land

Scotland: Googling Jurors Warning from Top Scottish Lawyer

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009

From the Article:

Donald Findlay QC, one of Scotland’s top criminal lawyers, has warned that the impartiality of the jury system is at risk due to jurors using internet search engines and has warned that the Government cannot continue with its “ostrich-like” attitude to the problem.

Writing in Scottish Legal News, the daily information service for Scotland’s lawyers, Mr Findlay called for tighter rules to warn jurors about using the internet to research cases they are sitting in.

Mr Findlay, who has acted in some of Scotland’s most high-profile cases, says that the Scottish Government needs to upgrade its legislation to stop “Googling jurors”.

Source: stv

Searching Can be Good For Your Health: Internet Alters Older Brains in Just One Week

Monday, October 19th, 2009

From the Article:

Adults with little Internet experience show changes in their brain activity after just one week online, a new study finds.

The results suggest Internet training can stimulate neural activation patterns and could potentially enhance brain function and cognition in older adults.

“We found that for older people with minimal experience, performing Internet searches for even a relatively short period of time can change brain activity patterns and enhance function,” Dr. Gary Small, study author and professor of psychiatry at the Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, said in a statement.

[Snip]

Previous research by the UCLA team found that searching online resulted in a more than twofold increase in brain activation in older adults with prior experience, compared with those with little Internet experience. The new findings suggest that it may take only days for those with minimal experience to match the activity levels of those with years of experience, said Small.

Source: LiveScience.com (via MSNBC)

Why Are Web Sites So Confusing?

Monday, October 19th, 2009

Why Are Web Sites So Confusing?

Just as bread and milk are often found at far-away ends of the supermarket, Web sites that match consumers with certain products have an incentive to steer users to products that yield the highest margins. The result: a compromise between what users want and what produces the most revenues, say HBS professor Andrei Hagiu and Toulouse School of Economics researcher Bruno Jullien. A look inside the world of search.

+ Why Do Intermediaries Divert Search? (PDF; 490 KB)

Source: Harvard Business School Working Knowledge

Google and Its Design Philosophy

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

Matt McGee Writes on Search Engine Land:

[Director of User Experience Irene] Au leads a 200-person user experience team that often gets involved in new projects long after the design has started. She tells TechRadar that projects are typically started by engineers, and a developer toolkit lets the engineers “get 70 to 80 per cent of the way there without having a designer involved.”

Access the Complete Search Engine Land Post

Source Search Engine Land

Google, Microsoft Boost Search Share; Yahoo Declines + Both Facebook & Twitter Share Continue to Grow

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

From the Bloomberg Article:

Google and Microsoft boosted their share of the U.S. Internet search market in September, while Yahoo lost ground, according to research firm ComScore Inc.

Google’s share increased to 64.9 percent from 64.6 percent in August, Reston, Virginia-based ComScore said yesterday. Microsoft rose to 9.4 percent from 9.3 percent, while Yahoo dropped to 18.8 percent from 19.3 percent, ComScore said.

What about Twitter and Facebook? What’s most interesting are these numbers vs. last year.

Facebook Inc., the No. 1 social-networking site, had 95.5 million U.S. users during September, up 3.6 percent from the previous month, according to ComScore. The number more than doubled from a year earlier.

Twitter Inc., the No. 3 social-networking site in the U.S., had little growth in September from the previous month, with 20.9 million users. Compared with a year earlier, though, its users have swelled 18-fold.

Source: Bloomberg

See Also: If you Would like to Compare comScore September Rankings with September Rankings from Experian Hitwise, Here’s Our Hitwise Post (October 7, 2009).
This post also discusses search query length (how many terms are users placing in the search box.

See Also: Expanded and Enhanced Rankings from comScore

An Introduction to Factual

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

In a Search Engine Land post titled “Factual: Parting The Curtains Of The Invisible Web, Chris Sherman* introduces a database named Factual.

Here are a few points from the complete article:

1) Factual is a self-described “open data repository.” Like Wolfram Alpha, a “computational knowledge engine” that launched earlier this year, Factual seeks to create order from chaos by allowing anyone to share and mash open data on any subject, structuring information in database-like tables.

2) Unlike Wolfram Alpha, which is a closed system with data “curated” by employees, Factual has adopted a Wikipedia-like model which allows anyone to create, structure or even edit data in Factual tables. [Company founder Gil] Elbaz hopes this open model [they have about 10,000 tables as of today] will encourage community participation, enabling Factual to grow rapidly and enjoy widespread adoption.

3) As good as Google is at understanding open web content, it struggles to access this “deep” or “invisible” web content, largely because Google can’t easily interact with the user interfaces of databases. (Google is experimenting with structured data, most notably with Google Squared and Fusion Tables, but these are Google Labs projects and don’t appear to be major initiatives for mainstream search.)

4) Factual is allowing registered users to edit data, but rather than adopting Wikipedia’s “edit and replace” model, Factual lets people add information to a table without overwriting or deleting existing data. It then uses a consensus-based model to settle on the most authoritative facts to display. Elbaz says this makes it difficult to impossible for a charlatan to corrupt data with incorrect entries.

5) Search results, however, are very different [vs. Google and other engines}. Because Factual is searching data, you’re presented with the name of data tables, along with the fields in the table. You can sort results by relevance, table name, last updated, author, views, rows or user rating. Once you click through on a result, the table is displayed very much like an Excel spreadsheet.


The article goes
on to provide more background, explain Factual result sets, discuss how to create your own tables and mashups.

Make sure to read the complete article.

Access the Factual Web Site.

Source: Search Engine Land

See Also: Much More via Factual Blog

See Also: A Brief Users Guide to Wolfram|Alpha (May, 2009)

See Also: Wolfram|Alpha Officially Announces New Web Site for Educators and Students; Plans for “Homework Day” Webcast Also Released (10/09)

* In 2001 Chris Sherman co-authored a book titled, The Invisible Web, with ResourceShelf’s Gary Price.

Bing Reference Home Page Now Online

Friday, October 9th, 2009

From the Blog Post:

From the Bing homepage, click “more,” then click “Reference,” to be taken to Bing Reference’s very own homepage. Or you can always access Reference directly by going to http://www.bing.com/reference. Bing Reference is a product of the Powerset team at Bing. From the new Reference homepage you can begin your research on interesting topics of the day, and see examples of reference queries that illustrate the natural-language capabilities of our semantic technology.

Access Bing Reference Homepage

We ran several searches and most of the content came from a nicely enhanced version of Wikipedia along with the Freebase project. Here are three examples:

+ World Series

+ Population of Greenland

+ Internet History

One question we have is how often is the Bing/Powerset version of Wikipedia updated with new/changed/removed/edited data? One of the positives (it can also be seen as a negative) is the very dynamic (non-stop) nature of the Wikipedia corpus.

Source: Bing Community

Google Flu Trends Continues its Global Expansion

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

From a Google Blog Post:

…at Google.org are excited to announce the expansion of Google Flu Trends to 16 additional countries, including much of Europe. We’ve also made the site available in 37 languages.

[Snip]

In the past year, we’ve expanded our coverage to include Mexico, New Zealand and Australia and have continued to see a good correspondence between our estimates and official flu activity data. In fact, our analysis of last season shows that Google Flu Trends had a close 0.92 correlation with official U.S. flu data.

The blog post includes a two minute video on how Google built the the model that powers Google Flu Trends.

If you want to learn even more the FAQ and the “How Does this Work” page (and video) are required reading and viewing.

Access Google Flu Trends

Source: Official Google Blog

Google: Quickly View Formatted PDFs in Your Search Results

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

From the Official Google Blog Post:

Today, we’ve added new links to “Quick View” PDFs in your browser with the formatting intact. The new links are based on the same technology that’s available in Google Docs and Gmail, as well as to webmasters through the Google Docs viewer. We’ve been rolling this technology out to the search results page since July, and as of today we’ve added “Quick View” links to more than 50% of the PDFs in our index. The new links appear at the end of the second line of the result, right underneath the title.

Here’s an Example Search
Note the Quick View links for some of the results.

Source: Official Google Blog

September Rankings: Google Receives 71 % of Searches, Longer Search Queries Too

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

From the News Release:

1) Google, 71.08%, Up 1% Month-over-Month
2) Yahoo, 16.38%, Down 3% Month-over-Month
3) Bing, 8.96%, Down 5% Month-over-Month
4) Ask.com. 2.56%, Up 8% Month-over-Month

Search Query Length
One Word, 24.32%, 0% Month-over-Month
Two Words, 23.55%, Down 1% Month-over-Month
Three Words, 20.52%, Down 1% Month-over-Month
Four Words, 13.69%, Down 1% Month-over-Month
Five Words, 7.94%, Up 1% Month-over-Month
Six Words, 4.30%, Up 2% Month-over-Month
Seven Words, 2.33%, Up 3% Month-over-Month
Eight Words, 3.35%, Up 6% Month-over-Month

More in the News Release

Source: Experian Hitwise