NRC Solicits Public Input Into How It Can Increase Public Access to Security Information

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking suggestions from the public on how it can increase its level of openness related to security at nuclear power plants and certain other facilities while still protecting sensitive information. A summary of the feedback will be posted on the NRC’s Web site, provided to the Commission and considered in the development of new openness policies.

After the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, the Commission implemented a new policy of withholding certain information. Some information previously available to the public was withheld and new information, such as certain orders to NRC licensees on security measures, was designated as classified, safeguards information or sensitive unclassified information and withheld from the public.

In 2007, the NRC began redacting and releasing many of the safety documents previously withheld, and the agency is interested in taking additional action regarding security-related inspection and license performance information. Under consideration are several approaches, including adding more detail to an annual report to Congress on security oversight and to the cover letters for security inspection reports, and by making more information available on the NRC Web site.
…
Specifically, the NRC is seeking public input on a number of questions relating to what type of information the public wants. Sample questions include:

• What kind of NRC security inspection and licensee performance information would enhance your confidence in NRC’s regulatory oversight effectiveness?
• Is the information provided in the NRC cover letters to security inspection reports useful?
• What kind of NRC security inspection and licensee performance information would enhance your knowledge as to how safe and secure you and your family are?

Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission

This entry was posted on Saturday, August 2nd, 2008 and is filed under Access to Information, Search News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.